I was sad to learn today that Walt Disney's daughter Diane Disney Miller passed away today at age 79. Its wonderful to know that a family you have never met has made such a dramatic impact on your life. Walt Disney was widely credited with creating Disneyland in a large part as something to
give his daughter and we are all better off because he did.
Diane was a very generous woman who gave away millions and millions of dollars to charities and
deserving organizations - exactly as her father would have wanted her too. Rest in Peace and tell your father "thank you".
The Joe Lizura Blog is a collection of Joe Lizura's thoughts and popular articles that are fun and interesting. Joe has been a television weathercaster and newscaster in San Diego for more than 25 years. Joe is the Executive Director of The Solar Alliance Foundation and is also the CEO of The Allowance Media Group, dedicated to creating television shows, you can join Joe at http://www.linkedin.com/in/joelizura, and you can follow joe lizura on twitter at http://www.twitter.com/joelizura.
Showing posts with label Joe Lizura San Diego. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joe Lizura San Diego. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
Monday, March 18, 2013
Disney Makes A Bad Move
San Diego, Ca March 18, 2013. Generally Disney is a great company that usually has its finger on the pulse of everything that is good about families, children, entertainment and of course, business. But today's decision to prevent kids under the age of 14 from entering any Disney park without an older person to accompany them is borderline idiotic. Seriously, it's a virtual impossibility to have every kid escorted by an adult. Unless there is something I am missing about this policy, it seems absurd - according to what I read, Disney will not allow any child under the age of 14 to be unescorted by an oder person in their park. How's that going to work? I'm looking forward to seeing exactly how a divorced parent with 3 kids is going to be in 3 places at one time in the park, because I'm quite certain that her 14 year old and 12 year old are not going to want to be on kiddie ride all day with the 5 year old sibling. Or how about all of those school field trips from the 6th graders? Let me guess, they'll make an exception there because they won't want to lose the millions of dollars in revenue every year. Speaking of which, get ready for a tidalwave of season pass holders who won't be renewing because yes, they do drop their kids off at the theme park designed for kids - Helloooo?
All right enough venting, here is a link to the story from USA Today http://www.usatoday.com/story/dispatches/2013/03/18/disney-world-disneyland-minimum-age-admission/1996111/
And the story body:
Starting this weekend, Disney's U.S. theme parks will ban children under age 14 unless they're accompanied by someone the same age or older.
The new policy, which takes effect March 23, will apply at Disney World in Orlando and Disneyland and Disney California Adventure in Anaheim. Since most youngsters under 14 don't carry government-issued IDs, "the policy will be enforced as guests are entering the park, (with) a visual screening for someone who appears to be younger than 14," said Disney spokeswoman Suzi Brown. If the staffer determines that the guest is under 14, a parent or guardian will be notified and required to escort the child in the park, she said.
The policy was not triggered by "any kind of issue or incident," but was intended to "provide a consistent age of admission and address a question we occasionally get from parents," Brown added.
Families with annual passes, some of whom routinely drop their children off at a park for the day, were notified about the policy change in an e-mail last week.
Good luck with this policy.
Joe Lizura
www.joelizura.net
www.allowancemedia.com
All right enough venting, here is a link to the story from USA Today http://www.usatoday.com/story/dispatches/2013/03/18/disney-world-disneyland-minimum-age-admission/1996111/
And the story body:
Starting this weekend, Disney's U.S. theme parks will ban children under age 14 unless they're accompanied by someone the same age or older.
The new policy, which takes effect March 23, will apply at Disney World in Orlando and Disneyland and Disney California Adventure in Anaheim. Since most youngsters under 14 don't carry government-issued IDs, "the policy will be enforced as guests are entering the park, (with) a visual screening for someone who appears to be younger than 14," said Disney spokeswoman Suzi Brown. If the staffer determines that the guest is under 14, a parent or guardian will be notified and required to escort the child in the park, she said.
The policy was not triggered by "any kind of issue or incident," but was intended to "provide a consistent age of admission and address a question we occasionally get from parents," Brown added.
Families with annual passes, some of whom routinely drop their children off at a park for the day, were notified about the policy change in an e-mail last week.
Good luck with this policy.
Joe Lizura
www.joelizura.net
www.allowancemedia.com
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Joe Lizura San Diego Travel Tip
January 1, 2013. Here's a very useful article for saving money on flights, whether it's San Diego or any other city, this study points out the best number of days in advance to book you airline flight. I've also found that having your email on some of the travel notification sites also helps you lock in a low fare when they are having those 24 or 48 hour fare sales.
Here's the story. Bargain-conscious travelers have been trying to answer the question for years and are still stymied: How far in advance do you have to book to get the best airfare?
According to new research by CheapAir.com based on the travel site's review of 560 million airfares, the optimal time to book a domestic flight is 49 days in advance. If you're flying overseas, you should book almost three months -- 81 days, to be precise -- before you travel.
Too much planning for you? Don't worry. While the average domestic flight was the cheapest 49 days out, it didn't start to rise dramatically in price until about two weeks before the departure date. But if you wait until the day or two before you want to travel, get ready for some serious pocketbook pain. Domestic flights that would normally cost less than $400 jump to about $625.
Notably, it's also bad for your pocketbook to book too far in advance, according to CheapAir. People who booked 210 days before the flight ended up paying an average of $475 for a domestic ticket. There are exceptions and caveats, however. If you're booking for a high-traffic time, like Thanksgiving, it can make sense to book well in advance. The optimal time to buy a flight for Thanksgiving weekend in 2012, for instance, was 96 days in advance.
If you're taking an international flight, by contrast, you might score a real bargain by being spontaneous. For example, the best price CheapAir found for a Los Angeles-to-Tokyo flight was when the traveler booked one day before the flight.
Other factoids of note: Booking a flight on a Tuesday or Wednesday is not likely to save any money. But flying on a Tuesday or Wednesday will.
And, of course, while this study focuses on average ticket prices, there are a lot of one-time deals that can make booking at any given time either a bargain or a bust. CheapAir tries to deal with the frustrations of variable airline pricing by offering a customer payback program. If you book a flight through the site and find that your specific itinerary has dropped in price, it offers you up to a $100 credit for another flight. And what if another airline offers a better deal in the meantime? Unless you're traveling on one of the rare airlines, such as Southwest, that will allow you to change your ticket without penalty, you're out of luck.
Nothing quite like saving money! Joe Lizura
Visit Joe at:
www.linkedin.com/in/joelizura
www.twitter.com/joelizura
Here's the story. Bargain-conscious travelers have been trying to answer the question for years and are still stymied: How far in advance do you have to book to get the best airfare?
According to new research by CheapAir.com based on the travel site's review of 560 million airfares, the optimal time to book a domestic flight is 49 days in advance. If you're flying overseas, you should book almost three months -- 81 days, to be precise -- before you travel.
Too much planning for you? Don't worry. While the average domestic flight was the cheapest 49 days out, it didn't start to rise dramatically in price until about two weeks before the departure date. But if you wait until the day or two before you want to travel, get ready for some serious pocketbook pain. Domestic flights that would normally cost less than $400 jump to about $625.
Notably, it's also bad for your pocketbook to book too far in advance, according to CheapAir. People who booked 210 days before the flight ended up paying an average of $475 for a domestic ticket. There are exceptions and caveats, however. If you're booking for a high-traffic time, like Thanksgiving, it can make sense to book well in advance. The optimal time to buy a flight for Thanksgiving weekend in 2012, for instance, was 96 days in advance.
If you're taking an international flight, by contrast, you might score a real bargain by being spontaneous. For example, the best price CheapAir found for a Los Angeles-to-Tokyo flight was when the traveler booked one day before the flight.
Other factoids of note: Booking a flight on a Tuesday or Wednesday is not likely to save any money. But flying on a Tuesday or Wednesday will.
And, of course, while this study focuses on average ticket prices, there are a lot of one-time deals that can make booking at any given time either a bargain or a bust. CheapAir tries to deal with the frustrations of variable airline pricing by offering a customer payback program. If you book a flight through the site and find that your specific itinerary has dropped in price, it offers you up to a $100 credit for another flight. And what if another airline offers a better deal in the meantime? Unless you're traveling on one of the rare airlines, such as Southwest, that will allow you to change your ticket without penalty, you're out of luck.
Nothing quite like saving money! Joe Lizura
Visit Joe at:
www.linkedin.com/in/joelizura
www.twitter.com/joelizura
Saturday, August 4, 2012
Joe_Lizura - Lochness Monster Story
August 8, 2012 Joe Lizura San Diego, CA. So I stumbled upon this interesting story about the latest sighting of the "Nessie" more formally known as the Lochness Monster. Here is a link to the story from the MSN homepage. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48496067/ns/technology_and_science-science/
What's interesting about the story is not so much the fact that there is another claim of a sighting of the Lochness Monster itself - it's interesting, but because of its distance from the shoreline and lack of other objects to be used as a reference point to the size of the "hump" thought to have been photographed, it's more likely not the monster at all.
But that wasn't what was of interest to me. What really caught my eye was the Castle in the background of the picture, which doesn't look too spectacular in the photo. I saw the name of the castle was the Urqhart Castle. Just for fun, if you want to read a great story about the castle, click here on the Urqhart Castle link - it turns out that in it's day it was one of the largest castles in all of Scotland! It's history is also well documented, so in a kind of nerdy way, it's a fun little read - check it out! Oh, and as for the photo of the monster in the lake - is it just me or is there nothing in the water to see at all???
Have a great weekend!
Joe Lizura
www.joelizura.com
www.linkedin.com/in/joelizura
www.twitter.com/joelizura
www.allowancemedia.com/about_us
What's interesting about the story is not so much the fact that there is another claim of a sighting of the Lochness Monster itself - it's interesting, but because of its distance from the shoreline and lack of other objects to be used as a reference point to the size of the "hump" thought to have been photographed, it's more likely not the monster at all.
But that wasn't what was of interest to me. What really caught my eye was the Castle in the background of the picture, which doesn't look too spectacular in the photo. I saw the name of the castle was the Urqhart Castle. Just for fun, if you want to read a great story about the castle, click here on the Urqhart Castle link - it turns out that in it's day it was one of the largest castles in all of Scotland! It's history is also well documented, so in a kind of nerdy way, it's a fun little read - check it out! Oh, and as for the photo of the monster in the lake - is it just me or is there nothing in the water to see at all???
Have a great weekend!
Joe Lizura
www.joelizura.com
www.linkedin.com/in/joelizura
www.twitter.com/joelizura
www.allowancemedia.com/about_us
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




